Shaohua Note: This is my usual hair Beiqing Bao's column in today's comments. As is posted to the blog, which means little. Therefore, I might put one of the first draft, fourth draft, is also attached to the Eighth back from interested friends can see my changes into account and focus adjustment. published in the paper is issued is my Now habit: as long as the intention to change, even change a word, and I for a , but the change was grounded. judgment weakened only by the ground instead made up.
the reality of the situation of the right to appeal)
sociologist Li Yinhe as lectures in Jiangsu TV talk about ;, . However, there is a question worth pondering, this issue is so touching to:
Xue Yong scholars living in America in the things, What is wrong with you?
in my opinion, intellectuals, as a stronger expression and more opportunities to the people, instead of the expression of the right to appeal to others, there is no problem. such as lawyers is such a person, because they court, the parties have more than the expression. Of course, this analogy is limited, to say the following.
However, the expression of need separately, Li Yinhe, she proposed the legalization of same-sex marriage, decriminalize prostitution, are She can be seen as representative of the national law of the specific group of people the right to confirm the request. This is not only because she studied and understood, so they may be more sympathetic to them, and consciously embrace responsible for the upper body; also because those who openly express their own, have we all can understand obstacles. Our society can not afford their public expression. In some countries, these groups are themselves in the streets, singing and dancing to express the right to wish. and while we here present only by scholars and personal look at the expression to their lives and aspirations.
But Li Yinhe on States confirmed that, therefore, it is only my personal values, and not by others on behalf of expression. Xue Yong Li Yinhe means , a person is, the right to substitute the expression of demands of others, but not to advocate a do not believe in the value.
striving for is the law already has rights; Li Yinhe is a party for the (legalized gay marriage), it is the face of legislative demands, it is not the right law. The distinction meaningful.
in Sohu law, is really the biggest obstacle they face it? do not know the answer. and this expression and the answer from the foreign point of view, desire for a right to be recognized as the ultimate reality of legislative rights, is essential.
now with her criticism of Li Yinhe violent confrontation between, is that some can not confirm the expression of the strength and representation. They are different people so much desire to clash on the right, as that was just a clash of different values. Of course, she can retreat to promote The value of respect for others such a position. But it was only International scholars, Anthony b de b Ya it were the words race, though conservative, but profound: , not just empty talk and will have the practical consequences of the potential value of the rights, involves two people (or two, or two legal entities) the relationship between the rights of that party is the holder, the other for the the other side. all right for the protection of the interests of rights holders, there is a mirror opposite of photo film, that is, at least one other person's obligation. liberalism have expressed strong enough. They will measure: the value of their own, feeling able to cope with had changed; their own sense of justice and conscience can not stand not to change won.
This is a right and facing the reality of the situation demands .
2006-8-14 Beiqing Bao
attached:
When the researchers to become representative of the rights of (a draft)
sociologist Li Yinhe because of the legalization of same-sex marriage, prostitution and so innocent different point of view alone it has been a controversial news figure, because of the recent talk of ; actually do anything to promote a kind of thing your right to fight it! kinds of claims, the Li Yinhe's legalization of same-sex marriage, prostitution guilty of, are related to specific groups of social right is that these specific groups to the state and the law recognized the right to put forward the request. However, people who advocate these rights Why is she then?
The answer may be quite simple: She study them, understand them, but also study and understand them and society, the relationship between the State and others. Of course, her bold personality.
answer may also be more complex, and that is: some specific groups of their rights of public expression of desire, there is an obstacle we all can understand. But there is another side: in our society - including the ordinary people of the cultural, psychological, and even management departments, but also can not accept and bear their public expression - even though the streets of homosexuals and prostitutes abroad, a procession that we have been commonplace in television. They let others see their own eyes the existence of this group the right way to express desire. In our case, is a scholar's personal expression through the indirect to see. with an open expression of their own particular group compared to the open expression of a scholar, no doubt impact on society is much smaller.
scholars as representative of the aspirations of the rights of others, not just the issue of legislation generally. Some say that there are fewer opportunities for expression and expression of those weak people. They are called vulnerable groups, including the expression of respect for weak. I am here to homosexuals and migrant workers, said put together something, you may not accept, in fact, vulnerable aspects of their expression is the same. There are some individuals vulnerable groups to take extreme actions, and enhance their own ; expression intensity inadequate expression of the entire community to express issues imperfect mechanism.
scholars Chronicle Forum, there is a netizen made to Li Yinhe, a moral restraint, law, really the biggest obstacle they face it? public opinion and moral restraint lack of public expression, the expression mechanism is not perfect the problem, but also to promote social progress and justice played a key role in the case, but this virtual environment, anonymous, individual expression, still can not be replaced by a certain organization, the program expression. < br> We are in a rights consciousness, the era of active claims. All claims have only one goal and one ways: through legislation, the determination of rights. However, we have the right to appeal is difficult to believe that all will eventually be right. confirm a right recognized also means an obligation to others. The have the right to demand specific, not in contradiction with the rights of others, but with others, emotional, mental and moral standards and cultural conflict with.
expression for the right to demand of others (four draft)
sociologist Li Yinhe because the proposed legalization of same-sex marriage, prostitution decriminalized so different point of view has been the sole concern of the headlines recently because of talk of Chung's criticism, calling it others fight for rights is typical of the contemporary state of public intellectuals. Is there anything wrong with?
on In addition, Li Yinhe's legalization of same-sex marriage, decriminalize prostitution, can be seen as representative of specific populations she presented to the state law recognized the right to request. But why is she then?
The answer may be quite simple: She study and solving them, and also to study and understand them and society, the relationship between the State and others. Of course, her bold personality.
the answers may be more complex: the rights of specific groups of their open expression of desire, There we all can understand the obstacles. Our society can not afford their public expression. In some countries, these groups are singing and dancing in the streets, their rights to express wishes. And here we're all through a scholar see their personal expression.
scholars as representative of the aspirations of the rights of others, of course, not just the issue of legislation. In general, they tend to express fewer opportunities for those who are weak in the crowd and express endorsement . There are some individuals vulnerable to extreme behavior in the enhanced The first is self-organized social groups (such as trade unions, associations) is lower, the expression can not form sufficient strength.
scholars , but not without problems. Sohu China's current public opinion and moral restraint, law, really the biggest obstacle they face it? , for the same reason, for same-sex marriage, of expression. they are so much a right to the wishes of different people clash, but rather a clash of different values. For this reason, Li Yinhe accused of . because a person is, the right to substitute the expression of demands of others (lawyers are examples), but not to promote a value they do not believe. Of course, she is just the value of promoting respect for others. However, , a right of appeal was not required strength. because a right is recognized, often need to overcome significant obstacles and to pay a lot of resources.
international scholars Anthony De b bb game has such elegant words: not play the role of self-evident truth the most suitable candidate, or two, or two legal entities) the relationship between the rights of that party is the holder, the other for each other. all right for the protection of the interests of rights holders, there is a mirror opposite of photo film, and that is another obligation of at least one person. the limits of spiritual resources.
Therefore, the state and the public to see: the face of a right of appeal, he could not bear corresponding obligations; also depends on whether a party claiming rights in a clear injustice being, whether strong enough expression. they will measure: the value of their own, feeling able to cope with had changed; own sense and conscience can not stand just got do nothing to change.
1831, the French aristocrat Alexis de Tocqueville visited the United States, They are not necessarily the right to appeal, but is always a prove himself the power to influence others.
the real demands of the right border (eight draft)
sociologist Li Yinhe of television stations in Jiangsu because Seminar spoke about communication barriers and even the conflict is understandable. However, a problem faced by Li Yinhe, it is deep thinking, and that is: the expression of intellectual rights of others instead of demands, there is no boundaries and limits?
Xue Yong scholars living in America in the Response: expression of the right to appeal to others, there is no problem. such as lawyers is such a person, because they are in court more than the ability to express the parties. Of course, this analogy is limited, to say the following.
However, Li Yinhe expression to separate the point of view, she proposed the legalization of same-sex marriage, decriminalize prostitution, can be seen as representative of specific populations she presented to the state law recognized the right to request. This is not only because she studied and understood, so they may be more sympathy for them consciously embrace responsibility upper; also because open expression of their own, there are obstacles we all can understand. Our society can not afford their public expression. In some countries, these groups are singing and dancing in the streets, their rights to express wish. and here we present only through academic research and personal expression of life and desire to see them.
and Li Yinhe on claims. because no one group should the multilateral real love is recognized as a right to require the State, therefore, it is only my personal values, and not by others on behalf of expression. For this reason, Xue Yong Li Yinhe can not help but be mean to generation expression demands of legislation, it is not the right law, the difficulty is undoubtedly much greater.
Sohu really has come to the urgent need to This group does not openly express their own, did not let each group's sound can sound expression mechanism, we do not know the answer. Conversely, the same reason, for same-sex marriage, ; in the end how much, in fact, that is not clear.
present in Li Yinhe with her fierce confrontation between the critics, is the real strength of this number can not confirm the expression and representation. they are not so much on the rights of different people mutual collision, as it is a clash of different values. Of course, she can retreat to promote the value of respect for others such a position. But it was only strength.
we are in a right of appeal rights and active consciousness of the times. However, international scholars Anthony b de b Ya match it were the words, not only conservative but also profound: the most suitable candidate, the two legal entities) the relationship between that party is the holder of the right, the other for each other. all right for the protection of the interests of rights holders, there is a mirror opposite of photo film, that is, at least one other person obligations. assume corresponding obligations; also depends on whether a party claiming rights in a clear injustice among the adequacy of a strong expression. they will measure: the value of their own, feeling able to cope with had changed; their own sense of justice and conscience can not stand not to change won.
This is a right and facing the reality of the situation demands.
No comments:
Post a Comment